GitHub Container Registry vs Google Artifact Registry
A detailed comparison to help you choose between GitHub Container Registry and Google Artifact Registry.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
GitHub Container Registry
152 reviews
3.6/5
Google Artifact Registry
299 reviews
GitHub Container Registry is rated higher (4.0 vs 3.6). GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io) stores Docker images alongside your GitHub repositories. Free for public images, included in GitHub plans for private. Integrates with GitHub Actions for CI/CD. Google Artifact Registry stores Docker container images, Helm charts, npm, Maven, and Python packages in one place. Vulnerability scanning built-in. Integrates with Cloud Build and GKE.
GitHub Container Registry Container registry integrated with GitHub Actions | Google Artifact Registry Universal package manager from Google Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (152 reviews)✓ | 3.6 (299 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | GitHub users who want container images stored alongside their code in the same GitHub account | GCP-invested teams wanting a universal package and container registry with built-in vulnerability scanning |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit GitHub Container Registry → | Visit Google Artifact Registry → | |
GitHub Container Registry
Pros
- + Free for public repositories
- + Deep GitHub Actions integration
- + Part of existing GitHub account
Cons
- - Private image storage counted against GitHub plan storage
- - Less flexible than dedicated registry
Google Artifact Registry
Pros
- + Multi-format: Docker, Helm, npm, Maven, Python
- + Vulnerability scanning built-in
- + Deep GKE and Cloud Build integration
Cons
- - GCP ecosystem required
- - Pricing per GB storage and egress
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.