Fly.io vs Render

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fly.io and Render.

Fly.io

Fly.io

Deploy apps globally with sub-50ms latency

Render

Render

Zero-config deployment for full-stack apps

Overview
Rating4.2 (191 reviews)5.0 (114 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forLatency-sensitive applications — APIs, real-time apps, and globally distributed backendsSolo developers and small teams who want Heroku-like simplicity without Heroku's pricing
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores1 vCPU0 vCPU
RAM0.3 GB0.5 GB
Storage0 GB0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%99.95%
Data-center count353
€/vCPU/mo€0.00
€/GB RAM/mo€0.00€0.00
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyFranceNetherlandsSingapore+5
United StatesGermanySingapore
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optionipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessprivate networking
free tiermanaged optioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
Visit Fly.io →Visit Render →

Fly.io

Pros

  • + 35+ global cities — widest edge deployment network
  • + Bare metal performance in a PaaS wrapper
  • + Persistent volumes and managed PostgreSQL included

Cons

  • - CLI-heavy — less visual than Render
  • - Learning curve for networking concepts
  • - Documentation occasionally outdated
View full Fly.ioreview →

Render

Pros

  • + Git-push deployments with zero configuration
  • + Managed PostgreSQL and Redis in ecosystem
  • + Static sites free forever

Cons

  • - Free tier services sleep after inactivity (15-min cold start)
  • - More expensive than raw VPS for equivalent resources
View full Renderreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.