Fly.io vs Railway

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fly.io and Railway.

Fly.io

Fly.io

Deploy apps globally with sub-50ms latency

Railway

Railway

Deploy in seconds, scale in minutes

Overview
Rating4.2 (191 reviews)4.9 (506 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forLatency-sensitive applications — APIs, real-time apps, and globally distributed backendsDevelopers who want a project running in production within 60 seconds with no config files
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores1 vCPU0 vCPU
RAM0.3 GB0.5 GB
Storage0 GB0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%99.9%
Data-center count352
€/vCPU/mo€0.00
€/GB RAM/mo€0.00€0.00
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyFranceNetherlandsSingapore+5
United States
Tags
Tags
free tiermanaged optionipv6eu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessprivate networking
free tiermanaged optionus datacenterapi access
Visit Fly.io →Visit Railway →

Fly.io

Pros

  • + 35+ global cities — widest edge deployment network
  • + Bare metal performance in a PaaS wrapper
  • + Persistent volumes and managed PostgreSQL included

Cons

  • - CLI-heavy — less visual than Render
  • - Learning curve for networking concepts
  • - Documentation occasionally outdated
View full Fly.ioreview →

Railway

Pros

  • + Fastest time-to-deploy of any platform
  • + Usage-based pricing — pay only for what runs
  • + PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, MongoDB all one-click

Cons

  • - Less suitable for large-scale production workloads
  • - Pricing can surprise at higher usage levels
View full Railwayreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.