Filebase vs Hetzner Storage Box
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Filebase and Hetzner Storage Box.
Filebase S3-compatible decentralized storage on IPFS/Sia | Hetzner Storage Box Affordable, reliable cloud storage with SFTP and NFS access | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.9 (63 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (47 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €3/mo |
| Best for | Developers who want S3-compatible storage on decentralized networks like IPFS for resilience | Small to mid-sized teams and developers in Europe needing affordable backup storage or file hosting without vendor lock-in to hyperscale providers. |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | eu datacentergdpr compliant |
| Visit Filebase → | Visit Hetzner Storage Box → | |
Filebase
Pros
- + S3-compatible over decentralized networks
- + IPFS pinning with S3 interface
- + 5GB free tier
Cons
- - Decentralized — different performance characteristics
- - US jurisdiction only
Hetzner Storage Box
Pros
- + Access via SFTP, SMB, NFS, and WebDAV for flexible integration
- + Unlimited bandwidth for transfers between Storage Box and Hetzner Cloud products
- + Automatic daily and weekly snapshots included at no extra cost
- + Transparent, predictable pricing with no surprise fees
- + German data centers with GDPR compliance built-in
Cons
- - Limited to Hetzner ecosystem for bandwidth benefits; external transfers may incur costs
- - No native S3 API support, requiring workarounds for S3-dependent applications
- - Smaller feature set compared to AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, or Azure Blob Storage
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.