Fauna vs Neon
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fauna and Neon.
Fauna Serverless document database with ACID transactions | Neon Serverless Postgres with branching and scale-to-zero | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (339 reviews) | 4.6 (305 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Jamstack developers who need a serverless database with GraphQL API and automatic global replication | Developers using Next.js or serverless frameworks who want Postgres with branching at zero idle cost |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 0 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 0 GB |
| Storage | — | 0 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 0 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 8 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesEuropean Union |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapi accessopen source |
| Visit Fauna → | Visit Neon → | |
Fauna
Pros
- + Serverless — no scaling needed
- + GraphQL API native
- + ACID transactions across global regions
Cons
- - Proprietary FQL query language
- - Pricing can surprise at scale
Neon
Pros
- + Scale-to-zero — no charges for idle databases
- + Database branching for preview environments
- + Generous free tier — 10 projects
Cons
- - Cold start latency when scaled to zero
- - Less mature than managed RDS for mission-critical
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.