Fauna vs Hasura Cloud
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fauna and Hasura Cloud.
Fauna Serverless document database with ACID transactions | Hasura Cloud Instant GraphQL API on any Postgres database | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 (339 reviews) | 4.9 (129 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Jamstack developers who need a serverless database with GraphQL API and automatic global replication | Developers who want to instantly expose their PostgreSQL database as a GraphQL API |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit Fauna → | Visit Hasura Cloud → | |
Fauna
Pros
- + Serverless — no scaling needed
- + GraphQL API native
- + ACID transactions across global regions
Cons
- - Proprietary FQL query language
- - Pricing can surprise at scale
Hasura Cloud
Pros
- + Instant GraphQL from existing database
- + Real-time subscriptions built-in
- + Authorization rules in the API layer
Cons
- - GraphQL expertise helpful
- - Hasura-specific concepts to learn
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.