Fastly Compute@Edge vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fastly Compute@Edge and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.3/5
Fastly Compute@Edge
164 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Supabase Functions is rated higher (4.5 vs 4.3). Fastly Compute@Edge runs WebAssembly serverless functions at Fastly's edge PoPs globally. Ultra-low latency, near-instant startup, and support for Rust, JavaScript, Go, and other WASM-compiled languages. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
 Fastly Compute@Edge Serverless on Fastly's programmable CDN edge | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (164 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers needing ultra-low latency serverless at Fastly's edge with WebAssembly runtimes | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierapi access |
| Visit Fastly Compute@Edge → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Fastly Compute@Edge
Pros
- + WebAssembly runtime — fast startup
- + Fastly's global edge network
- + Multiple language support via WASM
Cons
- - Fastly pricing premium
- - WASM compilation adds complexity
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.