Fastly Compute@Edge vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Fastly Compute@Edge and Supabase Functions.
 Fastly Compute@Edge Serverless on Fastly's programmable CDN edge | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (164 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers needing ultra-low latency serverless at Fastly's edge with WebAssembly runtimes | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | free tierapi access |
| Visit Fastly Compute@Edge → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Fastly Compute@Edge
Pros
- + WebAssembly runtime — fast startup
- + Fastly's global edge network
- + Multiple language support via WASM
Cons
- - Fastly pricing premium
- - WASM compilation adds complexity
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.