Deno Deploy vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Deno Deploy and Supabase Functions.
Deno Deploy Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (70 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (372 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript developers who want edge computing with Deno's security model and zero cold starts | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Deno Deploy → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Deno Deploy
Pros
- + Zero cold starts
- + Deno security model — no file/network access by default
- + TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno runtime — not Node.js compatible
- - Newer ecosystem
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.