Deno Deploy vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Deno Deploy and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.6/5
Deno Deploy
70 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Deno Deploy is rated higher (4.6 vs 4.5). Deno Deploy runs JavaScript and TypeScript serverless functions at the edge using the Deno runtime. Zero cold starts, V8 isolates, and globally distributed. Free for low-traffic apps. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
Deno Deploy Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.6 (70 reviews)✓ | 4.5 (372 reviews) |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | TypeScript developers who want edge computing with Deno's security model and zero cold starts | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Deno Deploy → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Deno Deploy
Pros
- + Zero cold starts
- + Deno security model — no file/network access by default
- + TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno runtime — not Node.js compatible
- - Newer ecosystem
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.