Convex vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Convex and Supabase Functions.
Convex Reactive backend with real-time queries | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (33 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | React and TypeScript developers building real-time collaborative applications | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Convex → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Convex
Pros
- + Real-time reactivity out of the box
- + TypeScript-native with full type safety
- + No manual invalidation of queries
Cons
- - Convex-specific paradigm to learn
- - Not suitable for SQL-heavy workloads
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.