Convex vs Deno Deploy
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Convex and Deno Deploy.
Convex Reactive backend with real-time queries | Deno Deploy Deno JavaScript runtime at the edge globally | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 (33 reviews) | 4.6 (70 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | React and TypeScript developers building real-time collaborative applications | TypeScript developers who want edge computing with Deno's security model and zero cold starts |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tieropen sourceeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access |
| Visit Convex → | Visit Deno Deploy → | |
Convex
Pros
- + Real-time reactivity out of the box
- + TypeScript-native with full type safety
- + No manual invalidation of queries
Cons
- - Convex-specific paradigm to learn
- - Not suitable for SQL-heavy workloads
Deno Deploy
Pros
- + Zero cold starts
- + Deno security model — no file/network access by default
- + TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno runtime — not Node.js compatible
- - Newer ecosystem
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.