ConoHa (GMO) vs Vultr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ConoHa (GMO) and Vultr.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
ConoHa (GMO)
338 reviews
4.2/5
Vultr
499 reviews
Vultr is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). ConoHa is a VPS service by GMO Internet Group targeting Japanese market but available internationally. SSD VPS in Tokyo, Osaka, and Singapore. Hourly billing and good API. Popular in Japan. Vultr is a cloud platform offering VPS, bare metal servers, and Kubernetes hosting across 32 data centers worldwide. Built for developers and businesses needing scalable, reliable compute resources with transparent billing.
ConoHa (GMO) Japanese VPS from GMO Internet Group | Vultr High-performance cloud infrastructure with global data centers and competitive pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (338 reviews) | 4.2 (499 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €4/mo✓ | From €5/mo |
| Best for | Developers and businesses in Japan or those needing low-latency Japan presence for their application | Developers and DevOps teams building applications requiring low latency across multiple regions or those prioritizing cost-effective, API-first infrastructure management. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 25 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 32 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €5.00 |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | — | 4,100 |
| Disk read (fio) | — | 1,800 MB/s |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | — | 38,000 |
| Network out | — | 1 Gbps |
| Latency (TTFB) | — | 24 ms |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6 |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6backups includedapac datacenterwindows available | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available |
| Visit ConoHa (GMO) → | Visit Vultr → | |
ConoHa (GMO)
Pros
- + Tokyo and Osaka Japanese datacenters
- + Hourly billing available
- + GMO Group backing — stable company
Cons
- - Japanese market focus — some docs only in Japanese
- - Less competitive internationally
Vultr
Pros
- + Deploy servers in 32 global locations with minimal latency
- + Access affordable pricing with hourly billing and no setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via intuitive dashboard or REST API
- + Scale resources on-demand without contract commitments
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem of pre-built applications compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support limited to ticketing system; no phone support on lower plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.