ConoHa (GMO) vs Scaleway
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ConoHa (GMO) and Scaleway.
ConoHa (GMO) Japanese VPS from GMO Internet Group | Scaleway European cloud infrastructure with competitive pricing and transparent billing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (338 reviews) | 4.8 (475 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | freemium |
| Starting price | From €4/mo | Free tier available✓ |
| Best for | Developers and businesses in Japan or those needing low-latency Japan presence for their application | European startups and developers prioritizing cost efficiency, data sovereignty, and avoiding long-term contracts with established cloud providers. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 2 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 2 GB |
| Storage | — | 20 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 5 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €0.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.00 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | FranceNetherlandsPoland |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6backups includedapac datacenterwindows available | free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionsnapshotsmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacentergdpr compliantterraform providerkubernetes supportapi access |
| Visit ConoHa (GMO) → | Visit Scaleway → | |
ConoHa (GMO)
Pros
- + Tokyo and Osaka Japanese datacenters
- + Hourly billing available
- + GMO Group backing — stable company
Cons
- - Japanese market focus — some docs only in Japanese
- - Less competitive internationally
Scaleway
Pros
- + Configure instances precisely with granular CPU, RAM, and storage options
- + Access bare-metal servers at lower price points than major competitors
- + Pay by the hour with no long-term contracts or setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via API or intuitive dashboard
- + Comply with EU data residency requirements with multiple European regions
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support response times slower than premium enterprise providers
- - Limited US region availability; primarily Europe-focused infrastructure
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.