Skip to content

ConoHa (GMO) vs Contabo

A detailed comparison to help you choose between ConoHa (GMO) and Contabo.

Quick Verdict

3.9/5

ConoHa (GMO)

338 reviews

4.2/5

Contabo

420 reviews

Contabo is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). ConoHa is a VPS service by GMO Internet Group targeting Japanese market but available internationally. SSD VPS in Tokyo, Osaka, and Singapore. Hourly billing and good API. Popular in Japan. German provider known for extremely large RAM allocations at very low prices. VPS S: 4 vCPU, 6GB RAM, 100GB SSD for ~€4.50/month. Popular in budget communities despite mixed performance reviews.

ConoHa (GMO)

ConoHa (GMO)

Japanese VPS from GMO Internet Group

Contabo

Contabo

Affordable VPS hosting with generous resources at predictable pricing

Overview
Rating3.9 (338 reviews)4.2 (420 reviews)
Pricing modelpaidpaid
Starting priceFrom €4/moFrom €4/mo
Best forDevelopers and businesses in Japan or those needing low-latency Japan presence for their applicationBudget-conscious developers and startups needing reliable VPS infrastructure with generous specifications without enterprise pricing
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores4 vCPU
RAM6 GB
Storage100 GB
Bandwidth32 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%
Data-center count4
€/vCPU/mo€1.00
€/GB RAM/mo€0.67
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
GermanyUnited StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
Tags
Tags
hourly billingnvme storageipv6backups includedapac datacenterwindows available
nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterwindows available
Visit ConoHa (GMO) →Visit Contabo →

ConoHa (GMO)

Pros

  • + Tokyo and Osaka Japanese datacenters
  • + Hourly billing available
  • + GMO Group backing — stable company

Cons

  • - Japanese market focus — some docs only in Japanese
  • - Less competitive internationally
View full ConoHa (GMO)review →

Contabo

Pros

  • + Pack substantial CPU and storage allocations relative to cost
  • + Choose between hourly and monthly billing cycles for flexibility
  • + Access multiple global data center locations
  • + Provide root/admin access for full server control

Cons

  • - Support response times slower than premium competitors
  • - Limited documentation and community resources versus larger providers
  • - Standard uptime SLA (99.9%) may not suit critical applications
View full Contaboreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.