ConoHa (GMO) vs Cherry Servers
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ConoHa (GMO) and Cherry Servers.
ConoHa (GMO) Japanese VPS from GMO Internet Group | Cherry Servers Lithuanian bare metal and cloud at EU pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (338 reviews) | 4.8 (383 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €4/mo✓ | From €6/mo |
| Best for | Developers and businesses in Japan or those needing low-latency Japan presence for their application | EU developers wanting affordable bare metal or VPS with hourly billing and full API control |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | hourly billingnvme storageipv6backups includedapac datacenterwindows available | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacentergdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit ConoHa (GMO) → | Visit Cherry Servers → | |
ConoHa (GMO)
Pros
- + Tokyo and Osaka Japanese datacenters
- + Hourly billing available
- + GMO Group backing — stable company
Cons
- - Japanese market focus — some docs only in Japanese
- - Less competitive internationally
Cherry Servers
Pros
- + EU bare metal at competitive pricing
- + Hourly billing with API access
- + Lithuanian and Amsterdam locations
Cons
- - Small EU provider
- - Limited APAC presence
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.