CockroachDB vs PlanetScale Vitess
A detailed comparison to help you choose between CockroachDB and PlanetScale Vitess.
CockroachDB Distributed SQL database that survives failures | PlanetScale Vitess MySQL-compatible serverless — Vitess under the hood | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (357 reviews) | 4.8 (205 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | free |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best for | Applications requiring high availability across multiple regions where database availability is mission-critical | Database engineers wanting to understand or self-host the Vitess technology underlying PlanetScale |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiermanaged optionbackups includedeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access |
| Visit CockroachDB → | Visit PlanetScale Vitess → | |
CockroachDB
Pros
- + Survives datacenter failures by design
- + Postgres-compatible SQL
- + Automatic geographic distribution
Cons
- - More complex than standard Postgres
- - Free tier limits apply
PlanetScale Vitess
Pros
- + Open-source Vitess powering PlanetScale
- + YouTube-scale tested
- + Horizontal sharding for MySQL
Cons
- - Complex to self-host
- - No foreign key support in Vitess
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.