Cloudflare WAF vs Path.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare WAF and Path.net.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Cloudflare WAF
249 reviews
3.6/5
Path.net
278 reviews
Path.net is rated higher (3.6 vs 3.5). Cloudflare's Web Application Firewall protects against OWASP Top 10, zero-day vulnerabilities, and DDoS. 300+ global PoPs absorb attacks. Free plan blocks basic threats; Pro adds OWASP managed rules. Path Network provides automated BGP-based DDoS protection and CDN with anycast routing across 9Tbps of capacity. Used by game companies needing high-volume DDoS mitigation.
Cloudflare WAF Web Application Firewall protecting millions of sites | Path.net BGP DDoS protection with anycast routing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (249 reviews) | 3.6 (278 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €300/mo |
| Best for | Every website — Cloudflare WAF is the standard baseline for web application firewall protection | Gaming companies and CDN operators needing large-scale BGP-based DDoS mitigation |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierddos protectionapi accesseu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter |
| Visit Cloudflare WAF → | Visit Path.net → | |
Cloudflare WAF
Pros
- + Free WAF rules on all plans
- + DDoS mitigation up to 142Tbps
- + 300+ PoP global network absorbs attacks
Cons
- - Advanced WAF rules require Pro+ plan
- - Some legitimate traffic can be blocked
Path.net
Pros
- + 9Tbps DDoS mitigation capacity
- + BGP announcement support
- + Game-company focused — handles UDP floods well
Cons
- - Enterprise pricing
- - Niche use case for high-volume DDoS
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.