Skip to content

Cloudflare R2 vs Ceph

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare R2 and Ceph.

Quick Verdict

5.0/5

Cloudflare R2

203 reviews

4.1/5

Ceph

301 reviews

Cloudflare R2 is rated higher (5.0 vs 4.1). Cloudflare R2 is S3-compatible object storage with zero egress fees — ever. $0.015/GB/month storage, no data transfer costs. Tightly integrated with Cloudflare Workers and CDN. Open-source distributed storage system providing object, block, and file storage through a single cluster. Designed for organizations building cloud infrastructure or managing petabyte-scale data.

Cloudflare R2

Cloudflare R2

Zero egress S3 storage on Cloudflare's network

Ceph

Ceph

Unified, scalable storage platform for objects, blocks, and files

Overview
Rating5.0 (203 reviews)4.1 (301 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfree
Starting priceFree tier availableFree
Best forApplications serving large amounts of user-generated content or assets where egress costs are a major expenseEnterprise teams and cloud providers building self-managed, large-scale storage infrastructure with multi-protocol requirements.
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.9%
Data-center count300
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Global — Cloudflare network
Tags
Tags
free tiers3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi access
free tieropen sourceself hostables3 compatible
Visit Cloudflare R2 →Visit Ceph →

Cloudflare R2

Pros

  • + Zero egress fees — massive saving for high-traffic assets
  • + S3-compatible API
  • + 10GB free per month forever

Cons

  • - Cloudflare ecosystem lock-in
  • - Not ideal for pure backup storage without lifecycle policies
View full Cloudflare R2review →

Ceph

Pros

  • + Consolidate object, block, and file storage in one infrastructure
  • + Scale horizontally with commodity hardware and automatic data rebalancing
  • + Use S3-compatible APIs for object storage without vendor lock-in
  • + Customize replication and erasure coding for cost-efficiency

Cons

  • - Steep learning curve for cluster deployment, monitoring, and troubleshooting
  • - Requires significant operational overhead and dedicated team experience
View full Cephreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.