Cloudflare vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.4/5
Cloudflare
122 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Supabase Functions is rated higher (4.5 vs 4.4). Cloudflare provides distributed content delivery, DDoS mitigation, and R2 object storage. Designed for developers and enterprises needing reliable infrastructure with minimal latency. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
Cloudflare Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 (122 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Teams building web applications requiring global distribution, DDoS protection, and cost-efficient object storage without egress fees. | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | 0 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.99% | — |
| Data-center count | 300 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | Global — 300+ cities | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider | free tierapi access |
| Visit Cloudflare → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Cloudflare
Pros
- + Remove egress fees with R2 object storage pricing model
- + Deploy content globally with automatic edge caching
- + Mitigate DDoS attacks with Anycast network
- + Integrate security and performance in one platform
Cons
- - R2 has limited regional availability compared to AWS S3
- - Steeper learning curve for complex configuration options
- - Egress costs still apply for some traffic patterns outside R2
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.