Cloudflare vs Supabase Functions

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare and Supabase Functions.

Cloudflare

Cloudflare

Global CDN and DDoS protection with object storage

Supabase Functions

Supabase Functions

Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data

Overview
Rating4.4 (122 reviews)4.5 (372 reviews)
Pricing modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting priceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best forTeams building web applications requiring global distribution, DDoS protection, and cost-efficient object storage without egress fees.Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database
Specifications (entry plan)
CPU cores0 vCPU
RAM0 GB
Storage0 GB
Bandwidth0 TB/mo
SLA uptime99.99%
Data-center count300
Features
IPv6
DDoS protection
Automated backups
Snapshots
Managed option
Bare metal
GPU available
S3-compatible
Hourly billing
Free tier
Data-center locations
Regions
Global — 300+ cities
Tags
Tags
free tiers3 compatibleddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessipv6terraform provider
free tierapi access
Visit Cloudflare →Visit Supabase Functions →

Cloudflare

Pros

  • + Remove egress fees with R2 object storage pricing model
  • + Deploy content globally with automatic edge caching
  • + Mitigate DDoS attacks with Anycast network
  • + Integrate security and performance in one platform

Cons

  • - R2 has limited regional availability compared to AWS S3
  • - Steeper learning curve for complex configuration options
  • - Egress costs still apply for some traffic patterns outside R2
View full Cloudflarereview →

Supabase Functions

Pros

  • + Low latency access to Supabase DB
  • + 500K free invocations/month
  • + Deno TypeScript native

Cons

  • - Deno differences from Node.js
  • - Supabase ecosystem dependency
View full Supabase Functionsreview →

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.