Constant (Choopa) vs Vultr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Constant (Choopa) and Vultr.
Quick Verdict
3.9/5
Constant (Choopa)
229 reviews
4.2/5
Vultr
499 reviews
Vultr is rated higher (4.2 vs 3.9). Constant provides dedicated servers with customizable hardware, DDoS protection, and 24/7 support. Built for applications requiring guaranteed resources and low latency. Vultr is a cloud platform offering VPS, bare metal servers, and Kubernetes hosting across 32 data centers worldwide. Built for developers and businesses needing scalable, reliable compute resources with transparent billing.
Constant (Choopa) Bare metal servers with full control and predictable performance | Vultr High-performance cloud infrastructure with global data centers and competitive pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 (229 reviews) | 4.2 (499 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €60/mo | From €5/mo✓ |
| Best for | Teams needing guaranteed resources and full hardware control for production applications or high-traffic services. | Developers and DevOps teams building applications requiring low latency across multiple regions or those prioritizing cost-effective, API-first infrastructure management. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 25 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 32 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €5.00 |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | — | 4,100 |
| Disk read (fio) | — | 1,800 MB/s |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | — | 38,000 |
| Network out | — | 1 Gbps |
| Latency (TTFB) | — | 24 ms |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6 |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenter | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available |
| Visit Constant (Choopa) → | Visit Vultr → | |
Constant (Choopa)
Pros
- + Configure hardware specs to exact requirements
- + Integrated DDoS protection included
- + Hourly billing option for testing and short-term use
- + Multiple geographic locations available
Cons
- - Higher base cost than shared or cloud hosting
- - Requires technical knowledge for server management and maintenance
- - Longer provisioning time compared to cloud instances
Vultr
Pros
- + Deploy servers in 32 global locations with minimal latency
- + Access affordable pricing with hourly billing and no setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via intuitive dashboard or REST API
- + Scale resources on-demand without contract commitments
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem of pre-built applications compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support limited to ticketing system; no phone support on lower plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.