bHost vs Contabo
A detailed comparison to help you choose between bHost and Contabo.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
bHost
129 reviews
4.2/5
Contabo
420 reviews
Contabo is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.1). bHost offers budget VPS across 6 US cities with DDoS protection included. KVM virtualisation, SSD storage, and unmetered bandwidth options. Active in budget hosting community. German provider known for extremely large RAM allocations at very low prices. VPS S: 4 vCPU, 6GB RAM, 100GB SSD for ~€4.50/month. Popular in budget communities despite mixed performance reviews.
bHost Budget US VPS in 6 cities with DDoS protection | Contabo Affordable VPS hosting with generous resources at predictable pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (129 reviews) | 4.2 (420 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €3/mo✓ | From €4/mo |
| Best for | US developers wanting cheap VPS with DDoS protection across multiple US datacenter choices | Budget-conscious developers and startups needing reliable VPS infrastructure with generous specifications without enterprise pricing |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 6 GB |
| Storage | — | 100 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 32 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 4 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €1.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.67 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | GermanyUnited StatesUnited KingdomAustralia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedus datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterwindows available |
| Visit bHost → | Visit Contabo → | |
bHost
Pros
- + 6 US datacenter locations
- + DDoS protection standard
- + Unmetered bandwidth option
Cons
- - US only
- - Performance inconsistent on cheapest plans
Contabo
Pros
- + Pack substantial CPU and storage allocations relative to cost
- + Choose between hourly and monthly billing cycles for flexibility
- + Access multiple global data center locations
- + Provide root/admin access for full server control
Cons
- - Support response times slower than premium competitors
- - Limited documentation and community resources versus larger providers
- - Standard uptime SLA (99.9%) may not suit critical applications
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.