Beam Cloud vs Vultr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Beam Cloud and Vultr.
Beam Cloud Serverless GPU infrastructure with per-second billing and instant scaling | Vultr High-performance cloud infrastructure with global data centers and competitive pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 (307 reviews)✓ | 4.2 (499 reviews) |
| Pricing model | usage-based | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €5/mo |
| Best for | Teams deploying AI inference APIs, batch ML jobs, or GPU-accelerated workloads that need cost-efficient scaling without long-term commitments. | Developers and DevOps teams building applications requiring low latency across multiple regions or those prioritizing cost-effective, API-first infrastructure management. |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 1 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 1 GB |
| Storage | — | 25 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 1 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.99% |
| Data-center count | — | 32 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €5.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €5.00 |
| Performance | ||
| CPU score (sysbench) | — | 4,100 |
| Disk read (fio) | — | 1,800 MB/s |
| Disk IOPS (4K random) | — | 38,000 |
| Network out | — | 1 Gbps |
| Latency (TTFB) | — | 24 ms |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ✓ | |
| Snapshots | ✓ | |
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ✓ | |
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | United StatesUnited KingdomGermanyNetherlandsFranceAustralia+6 |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiergpu availableus datacenterapi access | hourly billingnvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedsnapshotsbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterterraform providerapi accesswindows available |
| Visit Beam Cloud → | Visit Vultr → | |
Beam Cloud
Pros
- + Pay only for compute used with per-second granularity, no minimum charges
- + Scale to zero automatically between requests, reducing idle infrastructure costs
- + Deploy containerized workloads with no vendor lock-in using standard Docker images
- + Integrate GPU-accelerated inference models directly into Python applications
Cons
- - Limited regional availability compared to major cloud providers
- - Requires containerization knowledge; less suitable for simple HTTP endpoints
- - Per-request cold start latency may exceed 5 seconds on first invocation
Vultr
Pros
- + Deploy servers in 32 global locations with minimal latency
- + Access affordable pricing with hourly billing and no setup fees
- + Manage infrastructure via intuitive dashboard or REST API
- + Scale resources on-demand without contract commitments
Cons
- - Smaller ecosystem of pre-built applications compared to AWS or DigitalOcean
- - Support limited to ticketing system; no phone support on lower plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.