Backblaze B2 vs rsync.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Backblaze B2 and rsync.net.
Backblaze B2 S3-compatible storage at a quarter of AWS S3 pricing | rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.5 (110 reviews) | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €8/mo |
| Best for | Developers and startups who need S3-compatible storage at the lowest possible price and don't require EU data residency | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | 0 vCPU | — |
| RAM | 0 GB | — |
| Storage | 0 GB | — |
| Bandwidth | 0 TB/mo | — |
| SLA uptime | 99.9% | — |
| Data-center count | 2 | — |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ||
| DDoS protection | ||
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ✓ | |
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | United States | — |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleus datacenterapi access | eu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Backblaze B2 → | Visit rsync.net → | |
Backblaze B2
Pros
- + $6/TB/month — significantly cheaper than AWS S3
- + Free egress when paired with Cloudflare
- + S3-compatible API — drop-in replacement
Cons
- - US-only datacenters — no EU data residency option
- - No EU-based storage
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.