Amazon S3 vs rsync.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Amazon S3 and rsync.net.
 Amazon S3 The original cloud object storage — industry standard | rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (198 reviews) | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | paid |
| Starting price | Free tier available✓ | From €8/mo |
| Best for | Applications that need maximum ecosystem integration with every cloud tool — S3 is the universal standard | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tiers3 compatibleapi accessus datacentereu datacenterapac datacenterterraform provider | eu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Amazon S3 → | Visit rsync.net → | |
Amazon S3
Pros
- + Industry standard — every tool integrates with S3
- + 11 nines durability
- + Lifecycle policies to Glacier
Cons
- - Egress fees add up significantly
- - Complex pricing model
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.