AWS EC2 vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS EC2 and Supabase Functions.
Quick Verdict
4.1/5
AWS EC2
128 reviews
4.5/5
Supabase Functions
372 reviews
Supabase Functions is rated higher (4.5 vs 4.1). Amazon EC2 is the original IaaS cloud, offering 750+ instance types across compute, memory, storage, and GPU. On-demand, reserved, and spot pricing. 99 availability zones globally. Supabase Edge Functions run TypeScript on Deno at global edge locations. Access your Supabase database from functions with minimal latency. Free tier includes 500K invocations per month.
 AWS EC2 The original cloud — 750+ instance types | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (128 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Enterprise teams with AWS expertise who need the broadest instance selection and global availability | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionbackups includedmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessterraform providerkubernetes support | free tierapi access |
| Visit AWS EC2 → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
AWS EC2
Pros
- + Largest instance type selection — 750+
- + Spot instances for 90% discount on interruption-tolerant workloads
- + 99 availability zones across 31 regions
Cons
- - Complex pricing — easy to overspend
- - Requires expertise to use efficiently
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.