AWS EC2 vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between AWS EC2 and Supabase Functions.
 AWS EC2 The original cloud — 750+ instance types | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 (128 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Enterprise teams with AWS expertise who need the broadest instance selection and global availability | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tierhourly billingipv6ddos protectionbackups includedmanaged optionbare metalgpu availables3 compatibleeu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterapi accessterraform providerkubernetes support | free tierapi access |
| Visit AWS EC2 → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
AWS EC2
Pros
- + Largest instance type selection — 750+
- + Spot instances for 90% discount on interruption-tolerant workloads
- + 99 availability zones across 31 regions
Cons
- - Complex pricing — easy to overspend
- - Requires expertise to use efficiently
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.