Arq Backup vs rsync.net
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Arq Backup and rsync.net.
Quick Verdict
3.5/5
Arq Backup
99 reviews
4.6/5
rsync.net
343 reviews
rsync.net is rated higher (4.6 vs 3.5). Arq Backup sends encrypted backups to your own S3, B2, Wasabi, or Google Drive. No subscription to Arq cloud — you own the destination. One-time purchase for macOS and Windows. rsync.net provides SSH-accessible cloud storage for backups via rsync, BorgBackup, Restic, and rclone. Simple pricing per GB. US and EU storage. Trusted by the open source backup community since 2001.
Arq Backup Mac and Windows backup to your own cloud | rsync.net Off-site storage for rsync, borg, and rclone | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 (99 reviews) | 4.6 (343 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €50/mo | From €8/mo✓ |
| Best for | Mac and Windows users wanting one-time purchase backup software sending to their own cloud storage | Linux and BSD sysadmins wanting SSH-accessible off-site backup storage from a long-trusted provider |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | encryptedself hosted | eu datacenterus datacenter |
| Visit Arq Backup → | Visit rsync.net → | |
Arq Backup
Pros
- + One-time purchase — no ongoing subscription
- + Backup to any S3/B2/Wasabi destination
- + Strong encryption
Cons
- - Desktop app only — no server backup
- - Destination storage cost is separate
rsync.net
Pros
- + SSH access for rsync, borg, rclone, and more
- + Trusted since 2001
- + EU and US storage options
Cons
- - No web UI — command-line only
- - More expensive per GB than Backblaze B2
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.