Appwrite Cloud vs Supabase Functions
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Appwrite Cloud and Supabase Functions.
Appwrite Cloud Open source Firebase alternative with self-hosting | Supabase Functions Deno Edge Functions close to your Postgres data | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.2 (135 reviews) | 4.5 (372 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best for | Developers wanting an open source self-hostable Firebase alternative for mobile and web apps | Supabase developers who want to run TypeScript serverless logic close to their PostgreSQL database |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceself hostableapi access | free tierapi access |
| Visit Appwrite Cloud → | Visit Supabase Functions → | |
Appwrite Cloud
Pros
- + Open source — self-hostable on any server
- + Complete BaaS: auth + DB + storage + functions
- + Active community
Cons
- - Self-hosting requires Docker knowledge
- - Less mature than Firebase in some SDKs
Supabase Functions
Pros
- + Low latency access to Supabase DB
- + 500K free invocations/month
- + Deno TypeScript native
Cons
- - Deno differences from Node.js
- - Supabase ecosystem dependency
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.