Aeza vs Contabo
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Aeza and Contabo.
Quick Verdict
4.0/5
Aeza
80 reviews
4.2/5
Contabo
420 reviews
Contabo is rated higher (4.2 vs 4.0). Aeza offers affordable VPS in Germany, Finland, Netherlands, and Russia. AMD EPYC processors, NVMe storage, and DDoS protection included. Popular in Eastern European developer communities. German provider known for extremely large RAM allocations at very low prices. VPS S: 4 vCPU, 6GB RAM, 100GB SSD for ~€4.50/month. Popular in budget communities despite mixed performance reviews.
Aeza Russian and EU VPS from €2/month | Contabo Affordable VPS hosting with generous resources at predictable pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 (80 reviews) | 4.2 (420 reviews)✓ |
| Pricing model | paid | paid |
| Starting price | From €2/mo✓ | From €4/mo |
| Best for | Eastern European developers wanting affordable AMD EPYC VPS across EU locations | Budget-conscious developers and startups needing reliable VPS infrastructure with generous specifications without enterprise pricing |
| Specifications (entry plan) | ||
| CPU cores | — | 4 vCPU |
| RAM | — | 6 GB |
| Storage | — | 100 GB |
| Bandwidth | — | 32 TB/mo |
| SLA uptime | — | 99.9% |
| Data-center count | — | 4 |
| €/vCPU/mo | — | €1.00 |
| €/GB RAM/mo | — | €0.67 |
| Features | ||
| IPv6 | ✓ | |
| DDoS protection | ✓ | |
| Automated backups | ||
| Snapshots | ||
| Managed option | ||
| Bare metal | ||
| GPU available | ||
| S3-compatible | ||
| Hourly billing | ||
| Free tier | ||
| Data-center locations | ||
| Regions | — | GermanyUnited StatesUnited KingdomAustralia |
| Tags | ||
| Tags | nvme storageipv6ddos protectionbackups includedeu datacenter | nvme storageipv6ddos protectioneu datacenterus datacenterapac datacenterwindows available |
| Visit Aeza → | Visit Contabo → | |
Aeza
Pros
- + Very affordable EU VPS pricing
- + AMD EPYC processors
- + DDoS protection included
Cons
- - Russian ownership may concern some users
- - EU and Russia locations only
Contabo
Pros
- + Pack substantial CPU and storage allocations relative to cost
- + Choose between hourly and monthly billing cycles for flexibility
- + Access multiple global data center locations
- + Provide root/admin access for full server control
Cons
- - Support response times slower than premium competitors
- - Limited documentation and community resources versus larger providers
- - Standard uptime SLA (99.9%) may not suit critical applications
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.